The Impact of the Edwards Rule Pertaining to Police Interviewing and Interrogation, Briefly discuss the impact of the Edwards Rule pertaining to police interviewing and interrogation.

The Impact of the Edwards Rule Pertaining to Police Interviewing and Interrogation

The Edwards Rule is a landmark legal ruling that was handed down in the United States Supreme Court case of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). This ruling established a number of important protections for individuals being questioned by law enforcement during police interviewing and interrogation. The specific ruling stated that a suspect who has already invoked their right to remain silent must be given a fresh warning if they are to be subjected to further questioning. This warning must be clear and unambiguous and must be given prior to any further questioning (Kassin et al., 2010). The impact of the Edwards Rule is significant in terms of the protection of individual rights during police interviews and interrogations. The Edwards Rule ensures that an individual’s right to remain silent is respected and that a police officer does not attempt to coerce a confession from a suspect. Additionally, the rule protects individuals from being subjected to lengthy, coercive police questioning in an attempt to obtain a confession (Davies et al., 2017). This is important as it helps to protect the rights of individuals who are suspected of a crime and preserve the integrity of the criminal justice system. Cont…