education

EDT 305 Final
Paper (40 points)

Due by 5:00pm on Thursday, Dec. 16

 Submit as a
Word or PDF through email:

Students pursuing a teaching license must also submit a copy of the paper
to Chalk &Wire

 

For the final
paper, students will write a 6-page (roughly 1800 words) essay that articulates
your philosophical position with respect to the purposes of schools. Your task
is to thoughtfully answer the question: What are schools for? Your paper must demonstrate interpretation and
analysis of some of the texts and ideas studied in the course. At the same
time, be sure to give attention to the personal meaning of your position, so
that it will be a useful guide for professional practice.

 

Assignment Alignment with
School and Department Themes and CSFE Standards

The paper
assignment is aligned with the standards of the Council of Social Foundations
of Education (CSFE) and aims to enable students to acquire the interpretive,
normative, and critical perspectives as called for by the CSFE standards.
Students will describe changes that seminal philosophers of education have
recommended for schools, along with reasons for these recommendations.

 

The theme of the School
of Education is building learning communities through critical reflection.
Activities designed to meet the standards of the CSFE should enhance students’
ability to reflect critically. According to the CSFE, the normative
(what ought to be) perspective involves the ability to determine what values
school policies and curricula should reinforce. The interpretive perspective
enables students to consider what values the school policies reinforce in
practice. Finally, the critical perspective entails the ability to
recognize differences between what schools should encourage and what they in
fact serve.

 

The Department of
Teacher Education chose as its theme the teacher as reflective decision maker
in a pluralistic society. Thus, an investigation of the values that various
philosophies reinforce should be most helpful in promoting this theme.

 

Guidelines

Make a Claim. Your
position concerning the purpose(s) of schools should be clearly communicated in
the introduction paragraph in the form of a thesis statement—a sentence that
presents to the reader a direct, clear claim about what you will argue. Here’s
an example: “In this paper, I will argue that the purpose of schools is to
xxxxxxx….”  Then use the body of the
paper to elaborate, explain, and provide textual evidence and analysis to
support your claim and about what “xxxxx” is and means.  

 

In order to
support your position on the purposes of schools, you will need to reference,
discuss, and analyze at least three required readings (not including videos) from the course
and at least one outside source (a source that was not assigned in the
course). For example, if it is my argument that schools should address
social and economic inequity and strive to make society more egalitarian and
democratic, then perhaps I would draw on the course texts by, for example,
Freire, Meier, and Du Bois (but certainly these are not the only three I could
choose).  But be careful that you are not
merely repeating what these individuals wrote without careful discussion and
analysis of their ideas; you also need to contextualize and interpret their
ideas with your own vision of
education, pointing out possible strengths and weaknesses of their positions in
relation to your own.

 

While you are
indeed discussing your position on the purpose of schools, this is NOT your personal
philosophy of classroom teaching; that is, this assignment is not designed to be
only about how you approach teaching (e.g., methods, instruction, or classroom management).
With that said, there may be room for some discussion of pedagogical
approaches, depending on which theories or texts that you use to support your
position. The point is that you do not want to discuss classroom practice at
the expense of the philosophical ideas and historical interpretations we have
studied this term.

 

This paper is NOT
a personal reflection. Much like your discussion forums, you will use the
course readings—and the arguments, ideas, language of these texts—to support
and defend your own philosophical position. An opinion piece or purely personal
reflection would simply put forward your opinion with little or no engagement
with the course content or readings. But for this assignment, you will use the
readings as a way to critically think through and support your own position. Doing
so involves a delicate balance between discussing the course content and
presenting your own view.

 

I will evaluate your
work on both the content of your ideas and how
you express those ideas. So be sure to: Proofread,
edit, revise and proofread, edit, and revise again! (I find that reading
my paper aloud helps catch grammatical mistakes and structural issues).

 

Citations

Use APA or MLA
reference style for the citations and a reference list (APA is generally used
in education). Be sure to use evidence and quotes from the readings. And
remember: there is a fine line between over quoting and under quoting. Find
that balance and be sure to unpack and analyze the quotes that you do use.

 

Page limit. Your paper should be approximately 6
pages, double-spaced, and 12-point font. There are good reasons to stay within
the page limit. As writers, we all need to practice the craft of writing what
we mean to write in the most efficient, clear, and direct way. Too often when
we have too much space, our writing can quickly become redundant and boring. Strive
to be an interesting writer, and this involves clarity and coherence.

 

Submission. The paper is due by 5:00pm on Thursday,
Dec. 16. Submit
the paper as a Word or PDF attachment through email ( ).

 

Students pursuing
an initial teaching license must also submit a copy to Chalk &Wire (see submission
instructions in separate document). 

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more