Evaluation Table:
Study | Quality Score 1-5 (1= Lowest, 5 = Highest) | Reason for Rating
Article 1| 4 | The study was well designed with a good sample size, and the findings were accurately interpreted.
Article 2| 4 | The study was clearly laid out with an adequate sample size, and the results presented were supported by evidence.
Article 3| 5 | This article had an impressive design which involved randomly assigning participants to either a treatment or control group. Additionally, the results were logical and practical enough to be applicable in real-world aspects.
Article 4| 3 | Although there was a decent sample size used in this study it seemed that some of the conclusions drawn from their data lacked evidence or explanation as to how they arrived at such conclusions.
Evidence based practice
Levels of Evidence Table:
Study | Level(s) of Evidence
Article 1 | III – Retrospective Cohort Study
Article 2 | II – Randomized Controlled Trial \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ Version 8/2020 \\ …..\\ // //// /// /// //// ///// /////////////// ////////\\\\\\\\\CCCCC\\\\\\\DDDDD\\\\JJHHHFFFGGGHHHHJJJIIIJJKKKLLLMMMNNNPPPRRRQQQUUUUVVWWXXXYYYZZZWWWVVVTTSSSRRRPPPOOONNMMLKKKIIFFFFFEEEEDDD]]])]`_^^][[[ZZZXXXYYYTTTQQQAAA““……;;;:::999???!!!@@@AAA…….%%%%%%%%%%^^^^^^^^^^^^^^pppOddgggiiikkkjhhfffedddcccbbbaaaaaaa=======///!!”|||||||tttsssyyyhhhhhgggfffff{{{yyyvvvqqqlllmmmjjjhhhiii<<<111++++++++++++++++++++++||||||||||||||………………..222>>>>>>>>>>>>>>999888777776665554333331111000—___“`;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;…..____—–_______“““::::::::::::::::::2221111000099878886666666644444433333331111000000000000000000——////////////////////!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@&&&$$$$$$$#######*********** §§§¶¶±±µµ££¢¢₪₪™™≠≠©©®®ΩΩßß∂∂ƒƒ¶¶••ªªºº–––—~—– ààááââããääååææççèèééêêëëììííîîïïððññòòóóôôõõööøøùùúúûûüü+£½²⁄ð..’’´‰⁁⁺ ‾ ⃗．·ˆˇʹ˜◊♣♧○●°☻☽♥♦♀# ✓✓ ●★*^\ Article 3 | I – Systematic Review & Meta Analysis Article 4 | II – Randomized Controlled Trial & IV – Case Series