For this Assignment, review the articles provided, “Urinalysis: The Supreme Court’s Justification Of High-School Urine Tests” and “Vaccines May Fuel Autism Epidemic.” Provide an analysis of the articles from a critical thinking perspective. Identify at least three errors in each of the two articles. Explain the implications of the errors you identified for your professional psychology practice. Be specific, provide examples, and justify your response with the Learning Resources/literature. Critical Analysis of Articles

Crucial Evaluation of Articles

Article 1: “Urinalysis: The Supreme Court docket’s Justification of Excessive-Faculty Urine Assessments” Error 1: The article asserts that the Supreme Court docket’s resolution in Vernonia Faculty District 47J v. Acton (2019) upheld the constitutionality of drug testing for all highschool college students, no matter particular person suspicion of drug use (DeStefano et al., 2019). Nonetheless, the precise resolution solely upheld the constitutionality of drug testing for pupil athletes (Board of Schooling of Impartial Faculty District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, 2018). Error 2: The article claims that the Supreme Court docket’s resolution was primarily based on the necessity to defend pupil athletes from the hazards of drug use. Nonetheless, the Court docket’s resolution was based totally on the varsity’s want to take care of a drug-free athletic program, not on the person well being and security of the scholars (Board of Schooling of Impartial Faculty District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, 2018). Error 3: The article means that the Supreme Court docket’s resolution permits for blanket drug testing of all highschool college students with none individualized suspicion of drug use. Nonetheless, the Court docket’s resolution solely applies to drug testing of pupil athletes, and it’s nonetheless topic to the Fourth Modification’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures (Board of Schooling of Impartial Faculty District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, 2018). Implications for skilled psychology follow: As knowledgeable psychologist, it is very important precisely perceive the authorized foundations and limitations of drug testing in faculties. Misunderstanding the Supreme Court docket’s resolution in Vernonia Faculty District 47J v. Acton might result in inappropriate suggestions for drug testing insurance policies or interventions for highschool college students. It is usually essential to think about the potential influence of drug testing on pupil privateness and well-being, in addition to the potential for false positives or different hostile penalties (Demicheli et al., 2019). Cont…